Stupid people?

Last night John Stossel hosted a special broadcast of ABC’s 20/20 titled Stupid in America. At one point, Stossel compared public schools in our country to other monopolies, specifically public utilities such as the phone company or the electric company. His argument encompassed the theory that competition was good and that by allowing for there to be competition in the public education system in the form of tax credits and vouchers, education in this country would undergo a dramatic improvement and reform.

It’s a nice theory, really, it is.

But, I’m not buying it.

I’m still on the fence about the whole deregulation thing and whether or not it’s been good in the long run. Monopolies like the electric company were deregulated out of business and suddenly we had rolling blackouts in California a few years back, the whole manipulation of the energy market by the likes of people such as Enron and also there seems to be a growing lack of investment in the upgrade of power generating facilities and the networks that deliver them - there just isn’t as much of a financial incentive for those old monopolies to upgrade their networks in order to make it easier to deliver power other companies will charge users for.

Same thing goes for the phone company. I agree it’s considerably cheaper to make a long distance phone call these days but, much of what has happened in the telecommunications industry is a result of technological breakthroughs that were well on their way. I don’t think deregulation made any difference in the explosive growth of the internet over the last decade. There are outside forces which came to bear on the telecommunications industry foreseen long before they broke up the Bells.

In each instance of comparison too, Stossel is comparing companies providing a very clear, straightforward service. Your lights are either on or their not. Your phone either works or it doesn’t. There may be variables in the amount the consumer pays or in the areas of coverage (in the instance of phone service) but, these are very concrete services being delivered.

I can’t imagine education being such a clear cut service and I think Stossel has done education in this country a great disservice with his oversimplification of the issue and his poor comparisons. Students have as much to do with their success in the classroom as do educators. Families have an even more important role in the formation and education of children in this country. The breakdown of families, the need for households to have dual incomes where both parents are working, the changing expectations for schools as something more than places where a child will go just to get an education all factor in to the state of education in our country.

One instance on the show cited by the online synopsis, talked about students going into schools in Washington DC (hand-picked by the city’s education people) and videotaping what goes on in school. There, a student apparently took off his shirt and started dancing around the teacher which Stossel used to illustrate the breakdown of education in even what are thought of as the best of schools but, I think it’s here where he totally missed the mark.

What about the parents of that kid? Who is raising a child that believes he can be so bold as to act out in this manner? Why does it become the teachers’ fault? If a child is bought up with a lack of respect for his elders or those in authority, how does it become the educators who have to take on the brunt of the blame? If you put a child in a position where they feel they no longer have to fear the repercussions of their actions how does that becomes the educators fault?

It reminds me of an oft told parable I’ve noted on occasion. I was speaking to a relative with two young girls in school. We were talking about education in this country and I wanted to underline something to him. I asked when he was a child if a teacher ever struck him or if he got in trouble in school what the reaction would be when he got home. His response was much in the way I remember my own experiences in that if you got in trouble in school, you would wind up paying for it when you got home - your parents would be asking the question, What did you do wrong?!”

Then I queried if a teacher dared strike his own little angels what his response would be and it was, “What did the teacher do wrong?!?!”

If kids don’t behave all the time around their parents, where is the logic in assuming that the little dear is going to behave once their out of sight of their parents? I mean, honestly! What planet are we on where children are these perfect little angels who behave politely and respectfully at all times? Within the last few years, the New York City school system ended the practice of “social promotion.” When I first heard about social promotion I was dumbstruck. Little Johnny can’t be left back a grade because it might damage his sense of self! Who came up with that one?

Let’s see how this prepares a child for the real world? MMmmmm, let me get this straight, if you don’t do the work and fail to make the grade they’ll not only keep you at your job but give you a raise as well?

Thankfully, social promotion was ended but, the amazing thing was the incredible uproar it caused parents and others who went out and demonstrated in droves against ending the practice! Teachers are not babysitters, they’re not the ones who can provide a child with an authority figure in their life if a parent is too busy or can’t be bothered to assume that role and certainly they have a tougher time doing their job if the very same parents who relinquish these obligations somehow hamstring them further by refusing to at least support teachers when they do try to correct the problem.

I think education in our country is one of the most important issues facing us as a society. It’s of overwhelming importance to have a well-educated citizenry without question. It’s the thing that will insure our nation’s future as a world leader. There is no question we need to look at ways to improve the educational system in our country but, let’s not forget the role parents have in the education of their children. We can go about enacting all kinds of reform, creating millions of charter schools and revamping the whole system in this country as we know it but, if we don’t look at the whole issue and the factors involved it will be akin to building a house on a bad foundation and we’ll just wind up spinning our wheels into stupidity.

Besides, I’ve got to imagine the monopoly in China isn’t hurting the educational system in that country (If Stossel’s observations are accurate - that wouldn’t be the case but it is). A standardized cirriculum controlled by the central government is still in place despite other reforms but, China stills emphasizes vocational training in a way that has fallen by the wayside in our own country. Schools are not businesses supplying a standardized commodity like phone or electric service, they are delivery method for information. As such, it is equally incumbent on the receiver whether or not the transfer of the information is achieved successfully.